Thoughts on Leadership
1. Influence
2. Connections
3. Adjustment
4. Position
5. Delivery of
service
6. The person who
does more – responsibility
In a country where so many wants to be president, leadership
is always a non-issue. Majority of the
candidates have not even displayed a single iota of leadership in their
fabricated career. Come to think of it,
some do not even have a career to speak of.
Most of them just ride on the name recall of their surname, literally
acquiring votes on the accomplishment of their famous relative.
Manny Pacquiao is one of the greatest boxers of all time and
by some stretch the fellow was elected as a representative in Mindanao. It was a stretch because other than good will
and good intention, the fellow has no academic qualification to speak of, no
governance or legislative experience, and in his illustrious career – no
preparation for the taxing work of a legislator. Up to this day, I question the wisdom of his
election. His legislative district would
have been better served by someone else more qualified for the work.
The twist now (in the coming 2013 midterm elections), even
his wife is running for an elective position.
Just what is the qualification of his wife? Other than giving Mr. Pacquiao his biological
children, she is a virtual nobody. She
must be beautiful once, but beauty is fleeting, just what are her
qualifications? Whatever it is, it is
nowhere near the qualifications of other candidates who are really qualified
for the position.
Leadership is not about popularity. Mr. Pacquiao and his wife might be popular,
they might be able to buy their elective position but they will never get the
esteem and respect that they are after in the first place. Sooner or later, leadership in its essence
will be called to fore and nemo dat quod
habet (you cannot give what you don’t have). They will have no tangible positions, and all
of their opinions are just a byproduct of regurgitated ideas planted by their
own limited circle of friends and advisers.
A puppet would be the appropriate notion here.
Leadership is influence.
In the long run, leadership is measured by the amount of influence
expended to shape a person, a group of people or an event. Was the position taken in consonance with the
policy and philosophy of the leader?
There are no absolute in leadership, in the realm of the ideal, one
could extol the virtue of no compromise but in the realm of reality, leadership
is about making compromises, of consensus making and of building allegiances.
Leadership is about connections. A good or a working leadership is based on
the relationship that a person has accumulated over the years. Just as it takes years to produce a general,
a leader takes years of incubation before one could claim such a title. More than anything else, there is no
leadership if there is no relationship or connections with people. In the end, leadership is about people and
how one relates with these galaxies of people.
Leadership is about adjustment. Just as there are no absolutes in leadership,
adjustment or the ability to adjust is the name of the game for a potential
leader. John Maxwell encapsulates my
thoughts on adjustment when he said that “the pessimist complains about the
wind, the optimist expects it to change, the leader adjusts the sail”. A leader must always be able to adjust and
adapt. Thousands of years ago, the
dinosaurs ruled planet earth, but now dinosaurs (and their remains) are found
in the museum, and why are they extinct?
Because of their inability to adapt and adjust to the changing earth and
its environment.
Leadership is position.
I am a little bit ambivalent about position, but there is no leadership
if there is no position. No change is
ever possible if there is no position in a particular issue or a case. Leadership must take a solid position in an
issue and defend such a position even at the expense of losing hierarchical
position and followers. When the
declaration of emancipation was signed by Abraham Lincoln, he lost a lot of
followers and supporters, but signing the writ was the right thing to do. And now, historically, President Lincoln was
validated by the tide of history and universally considered as one of the
greatest American president.
Leadership is about the delivery of service. Before one could assume the exalted position
of leadership, one must first assume the position or a role of a follower. No leadership was ever considered great
without first assuming the role of discipleship. No one is born into a general position; it
takes years of training, practice and seasoning before one could rightfully
claim the position of generalship.
Before one could ever claim the position of a teacher, one must first
assume the role of a student. Seniority
or seasoning must be considered into the equation especially if one is talking
about leadership. The delivery of
service is one tangible measurement where one could accurately claim the mantle
of leadership. The value of a weapon is
judged when such is already battle-tested, a vehicle is judged when such is
road-tested, and an individual must have the experience first before he could
assume the position of leadership.
The person who does more, the person who bears more
responsibility is the leader. While one
could delegate the work, the leader never delegates nor evades
responsibility. Great basketball coaches
let their players get the credit for every game that they won but they always
assume the responsibility for lost games.
Assuming responsibility means one still do something about the current
situation and such means that one bears the burden of carrying the group to the
next level of performance. There are
front liners and there are leaders.
Assuming responsibility, such is the hallmark of a true leader.
People are led, they are not managed. In fact, people tend to get offended when
they have inkling that they are being managed.
You manage time, properties, or even finances but never people. People give their best when they are
led. When there is proper leadership and
motivation, people would be willing to do anything and give everything. Personally, I believe that there is no such
thing as people management, such do not exist.
But what we do have is people leadership.
When there is a real people leadership, there is progress,
there is creativity, there is innovation and there are tangible
accomplishments. Sadly, the Philippines
is still denied this experience. What we
do have is a shameful establishment of political dynasty. The 1987 Constitution prohibits this as such
is expressly stated but the quality of politicians prevents such from ever
becoming a reality. It is not unheard of
where in a certain province, almost all the elected officials are related to
one another. From a simple municipal
mayor to the senate and to the palace, this shameful practice must stop. The country deserves better, the people
deserves better, we deserve better.
One of the curses of Philippines is that we were never
blessed by nobility. These inter related
politicians just don’t know the meaning and essence of such a word. What they have is political opportunism where
“striking while the iron is hot” is the main dictum.
The story of President Noynoy Aquino endorsing his cousin
for senator, Vice President Jojo Binay endorsing his own daughter for senator,
Senate President Juan Ponce Enrile endorsing his own son for senator, will just
keep on happening again and again with the names just changing.